| 1,206 | 35 | 447 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
当前以金砖国家为代表的新兴经济体发展迅速,而其中印度经济表现尤为强劲。文章运用双重差分倾向得分匹配法(PSM-DID),对印度FTA战略的出口促进效应进行了评估,并以此分析新兴经济体FTA战略的贸易促进效应。结果显示:印度的FTA战略使印度的出口增长了50%~60%;共同洲际及共同殖民地因素对印度的出口具有明显的促进效应;涉及到单个FTA伙伴的出口促进效应时,显著性并不稳定;FTA战略对出口的影响存在滞后效应。这一研究结论对新兴经济体,尤其是中国的经济发展提供了可资借鉴的宝贵经验。
Abstract：Nowadays the emerging economies represented by the BRICS countries flourish,and India's economic performance is particularly strong. Based on the difference in differences-propensity score matching( PSM-DID) approach,this paper evaluates the export promotion effect of India's FTA strategy,and analyzes the trade promotion effect of FTA strategy in emerging economies. Our results show that India's FTA strategy makes India's exports grew by 50% ~ 60% on average; and that common colonial and common intercontinental factors have significant promotion effects on India's exports. The significance is unstable when it comes to the export promotion effect of a single FTA partner,and the FTA strategy has lagged effect on exports. This research conclusion provides valuable experience for the economic development of emerging economies,especially China.
[1]Abadie A..Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2005,72(1):1-19.
[2]Achterbosch T.,Kuiper M.,Roza P..EU India Free Trade Agreement:a Quantitative Assessment[J].LEI report,No.059,2008.
[3]Ashenfelter O.C.,Card D..Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1985,67(4):648-660.
[4]Athey S.,Imbens G.W..Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models[J].Econometrica,2006,74(2):431-497.
[5]Baier S.L.,Bergstrand J.H..Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements[J].Journal of International Economics,2004,64(1):29-63.
[6]Box G.E.P.,Wilson K.B..On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions[M].Breakthroughs in Statistics,Springer New York,1992,270-310.
[7]Dehejia R..Practical Propensity Score Matching:a Reply to Smith and Todd[J].Journal of Econometrics,2005,125(1):355-364.
[8]Eissa N..Tax Reforms and Labor Supply.National Bureau of Economic Research,1996,10:119-151.
[9]Fisher R.A..The Design of Experiments.London:Oliver and boyd.1951.
[10]Glazerman S.,Levy D.M.,Myers D..Nonexperimental Versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts[J].The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2003,589(1):63-93.
[11]Heckman J.J..Snyder Jr J M.Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators[R].NBER Working Paper,No.5785,1996.
[12]Heckman J.J.,Hotz V.J..An Investigation of the Labor Market Earnings of Panamanian Males Evaluating the Sources of Inequality[J].Journal of Human resources,1986,507-542.
[13]Mikic M.,Gilbert J..Trade Statistics in Policymaking[J].A Handbook of Commonly Used Trade Indices and Indicators,UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific,2009,4.
[14]Moffitt R..Program Evaluation with Nonexperimental Data[J].Evaluation Review,1991,15(3):291-314.
[15]Rosenbaum P.R.,Rubin D.B..The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects[J].Biometrika,1983,70(1):41-55.
[16]Smith J.A.,Todd P.E..Does Matching Overcome La Londe's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators[J].Journal of Econometrics,2005,125(1):305-353.
[17]Veeramani C.,Saini G.K..Impact of ASEAN-India Preferential Trade Agreement on Plantation Commodities:a simulation Analysis[J].Economic and Political Weekly,2011,46(10):83-92.
[18]Viner J..The Customs Union Issue.Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,New York.1950.
[19]蒋冠宏,蒋殿春.中国企业对外直接投资的“出口效应”[J].经济研究,2014(5):160-173.
[20]李丽,陈迅,邵兵家.中印自由贸易区的构建对双方及世界经济影响计量研究[J].财贸经济,2008(4):111-116.
[21]刘瑞明,赵仁杰.西部大开发:增长驱动还是政策陷阱——基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(6):32-43.
[22]毛捷,汪德华,白重恩.民族地区转移支付、公共支出差异与经济发展差距[J].经济研究,2011(S2):75-87.
[23]万海远,李实.户籍歧视对城乡收入差距的影响[J].经济研究,2013(9):43-55.
[24]姚永玲,汤学兵.奥运与北京房地产价格的变化——基于DD法的分析[J].财贸经济,2008(8):50-55.
[25]余振,沈铭辉,王琼.论中国一印度FTA的贸易基础与经济效应——基于贸易流的实证分析[J].南亚研究,2014(2):12-27.
[26]周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果:基于双重差分模型的估计[J].经济研究,2005(8):44-53.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2017.07.011
中图分类号:F753.51
引用信息:
[1]张恒龙,葛尚铭.新兴经济体自由贸易协定(FTA)战略的贸易促进效应研究——以印度为例[J].世界经济研究,2017,No.281(07):122-134+137.DOI:10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2017.07.011.
2017-07-25
2017-07-25