| 256 | 0 | 55 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
文章基于RTA规则网络与FDI网络数据,运用TERGM模型与STERGM模型,系统考察了RTA规则网络深化对全球FDI网络的结构性影响。研究发现:第一,投资国在规则网络中的中心地位通过信息扩散和技术溢出提升其资本输出能力,从而推动FDI输出网络形成;而东道国的规则网络嵌入则因制度复杂性提升与资本竞争加剧抑制其吸引FDI,对FDI输入网络的促进作用相对有限。同时,两国在规则网络中的地位差距越大,双边FDI关系建立的概率越低。第二,动态分析表明,RTA规则网络在关系形成阶段显著促进新投资联系建立,在关系存续阶段对FDI输出关系具有稳定作用,但可能削弱FDI输入关系稳定性,体现出一定的投资转移效应。第三,异质性分析表明,上述效应在国别组合、投资类型及条款维度上存在明显差异,其中在发达国家之间投资、独资、水平型投资以及投资类条款中的作用更为显著。进一步的时间异质性分析表明,RTA规则网络对全球FDI网络的影响呈现“中心驱动-边际递减-相似性主导”的阶段性特征。
Abstract:Drawing on global data on RTA rule network and FDI network,this study employs TERGM and STERGM models to systematically examine how the deepening of RTA rule network reshapes the structural properties of the global FDI network. The findings are as follows. First,a country's centrality in the RTA rule network significantly strengthens its capacity for capital outflows by facilitating information diffusion and technological spillovers,thereby promoting the formation of the FDI outward network. In contrast,greater embedding of host countries in the rule network tends to weaken their ability to attract FDI due to increased institutional complexity and intensified capital competition,resulting in a relatively limited effect on the expansion of the FDI inward network. Moreover,a larger disparity in the positions of the home and host countries within the rule network reduces the likelihood of establishing bilateral FDI ties. Second,dynamic analysis reveals that the deepening of the RTA rule network significantly promotes the creation of new investment ties in the formation stage of FDI relationships. However,during the persistence stage,it stabilizes existing outward FDI ties while potentially weakening the stability of inward FDI ties,indicating a certain degree of investment diversion. Third,heterogeneity analysis shows that these effects vary across country pairs,investment types,and rule provisions. The impacts are particularly pronounced for investment among developed economies,wholly owned investment,horizontal FDI,and investment-related provisions. The temporal evolution of these effects follows a trajectory characterized by a transition from " centralitydriven" to " diminishing marginal effects",and eventually to " similarity-dominated" dynamics.
[1]Anderson J E,Yotov Y V. Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements,1990-2002[J]. Journal of International Economics,2016,99:279-298.
[2]Chauffour J P,Maur J C. Preferential trade agreement policies for development:A handbook[J]. World Bank Publication,2011,99(5):662-687.
[3]Di Ubaldo M,Gasiorek M. Non-trade provisions in trade agreements and FDI[J]. European Journal of Political Economy,2020,75:102208.
[4]Hofmann C,Osnago A,Ruta M. Horizontal depth:A new database on the content of preferential trade agreements[J]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,2017:7981.
[5]Laget E,Rocha N,Varela G. Deep trade agreements and foreign direct investments[R]. Washington D. C.:World Bank Group,2021.
[6]Medvedev D. Beyond trade:The impact of preferential trade agreements on FDI inflows[J]. World Development,2012,40(1):49-61.
[7]Peinhardt C,Allee T. Failure to deliver:The investment effects of US preferential economic agreements[J]. The World Economy,2012,35:757-783.
[8]UNCTAD. World investment report 2025[R]. Geneva:United Nations,2025.
[9]陈紫若,盛伟,张先锋.全球贸易协定网络对国际创新活动的不对称影响——基于制度环境的视角[J].中国工业经济,2022(4):80-98.
[10]陈紫若,王郑鑫,韩龙艳,等.全球贸易协定网络与国际创新合作网络的共同演化——基于跨网络效应的比较分析[J].财贸经济,2023,44(7):159-176.
[11]成新轩,杨博.区域贸易协定数量与出口贸易:持续创造或中途抑制[J].国际贸易问题,2025(8):88-105.
[12]董有德,赵星星.自由贸易协定能够促进我国企业的对外直接投资吗——基于跨国公司知识-资本模型的经验研究[J].国际经贸探索,2014(3):44-61.
[13]李丹,孟恒宇,崔洛源.RTAs环境规则深化是否制约中国企业“走出去”:来自企业跨国并购的证据[J].世界经济研究,2025(3):93-107; 136-137.
[14]李磊,路优.国际直接投资收益网络特征与影响因素——基于全球价值链视角[J].国际贸易问题,2026(1):156-174.
[15]李文韬,李诗韵,贺灿飞.全球对外直接投资网络的环节分异与空间特征[J].地理科学进展,2023,42(2):221-236.
[16]林梦瑶,张中元.区域贸易协定中竞争政策对外商直接投资的影响[J].中国工业经济,2019(8):99-117.
[17]米军,王怡凡.数字贸易规则网络与数字服务贸易网络的协同演化——基于SAOM跨网络效应的研究[J].国际经贸探索,2024,40(9):58-72.
[18]唐雨妮,卜伟.区域贸易协定下知识产权保护对中国对外直接投资区位选择的影响研究[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2021(2):94-110.
[19]王碧珺,高恺琳.制度距离对中国跨国企业海外子公司绩效的影响[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(8):111-130.
[20]许培源,刘雅芳.国际贸易投资新规则对国际生产投资布局的影响[J].经济学动态,2019(8):56-69.
[21]杨碧舟,彭羽.区域数字贸易规则网络地位对服务出口复杂度的影响[J].亚太经济,2024(4):62-75.
[22]杨继军,艾玮炜.区域贸易协定竞争政策、第三方信号效应对外资流入的影响[J].国际贸易问题,2023(1):73-89.
[23]杨连星,铁瑛.区域贸易协定、投资条款差异性深化与跨国并购意愿[J].管理世界,2023,39(9):36-59.
[24]杨连星,张桂琴,樊琦.全球自贸协定网络深化:中国位置与优化策略[J].国际贸易,2024(5):44-58.
[25]杨志浩.区域贸易协定网络的引资效应:外商追加投资视角[J].当代财经,2025(7):117-128.
[26]殷凤,孙明雪,李平.RTA数字贸易规则网络对增加值贸易网络动态演化的影响——基于时序指数随机图模型的研究[J].国际经贸探索,2026,42(1):4-21.
[27]赵晞泉,陈伟.全球外商直接投资主干网络动态演化及其韧性测度[J].地理研究,2025,44(9):2450-2469.
(1)限于篇幅,RTA规则网络拓扑图留存备索。
(2)限于篇幅,FDI入度网络和FDI出度网络拓扑图留存备索。
(1)限于篇幅,稳健性检验结果留存备索。
(1)限于篇幅,5类条款的详细子条款分类留存备索。
(1)限于篇幅,ERGM模型的详细回归结果留存备索。
基本信息:
DOI:10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2026.04.004
中图分类号:F831.6
引用信息:
[1]赵蓓文,崔可琪.RTA规则网络深化对全球FDI网络的不对称影响研究[J].世界经济研究,2026,No.386(04):75-89+136.DOI:10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2026.04.004.
2026-02-03
2026
2026-03-23
2026-03-24
2026
1
2026-04-12
2026-04-12